Tuesday, January 02, 2007

A Foot-Washing Hierarchy

I haven't been on the job very long at my new Church of God family in Greenville, but the entirety of my two months in this denomination has taught me vast things about differences and similarities between it and my previous two denominational experiences (Christian Reformed and PCUSA).

First and foremost, my experience thus far has further engrained in me the utter silliness of denominational differences. Some people find me to be wacky, unorthodox or impractical when I make statements like that, but its the truth. Greenville is very similar to Salem, NY, the city I served in a couple years ago, and similar to many cities in this nation right now, from many accounts. The fact of the matter is that the Church is in the dying minority in so many cities across our nation, whether we will admit it or not. Some of these cities, like Salem and Greenville, have this to a more advanced extent than others. Its hard to believe that a city 30 minutes from Grand Rapids could have such a small population of Christians, but my initial estimates put this city at about 1 in 15 weekly attending Christians.

1 in 15.

What that means, in conjunction with the massive poverty and job loss in our community, is that we have no choice but to bond together. Unfortunately, it is often the tough times that cause our bonding, but it is bonding nonetheless. I meet monthly with a group of youth pastors who span Lutheran, Catholic, Congregational, Orthodox Presbyterian, Non-Denominational, and myself from the Church of God. Our pastor is involved in similar groups which do similar sorts of ecumenical ministry. We need eachother and the rest of the denominational world will figure that out at some point, I know. One more point for comparison. Having been intimately involved with my past 3 congregations, West Hebron, Calvary, and Greenville First, I am willing to make the bold statement that, minus infant baptism & Catechism references, the worship, the confession, the committee structures, and even the sermons would be interchangeable at face value. That's quite a statement in and of itself - and its not one I made, rather it is one they are each making to the world, implictly ecumenical if not explicity.

Enough of a prologue. The real point of this blog is to affirm something in the Church of God that I am both fascinated with and covet for my own faith tradition in the Reformed faith: hierarchy. If you are a good modern Calvinist, you'll regard what I just said as a cuss word. After all, that's what we split from! We hated the corruption that Catholic hierarchy brought. We were even disdained at Luther's holdover, and more recently, the Anglicans/Episcopalians. However, what we gained by eliminating that hierarchy is burning out pastors today at an alarming rate not only in the CRC, but in others like her who leave pastors of churches as lone rangers.

A contrast is helpful. Church groups in the Church of God in the US are done by state. It helps to have a large enough denomination to do this, but its the geographical thought that counts. So far, there's an analogy in the classical system of the CRC. As opposed to the typical classis, however, whose meetings last for a morning on a Saturday, State General Assembly meetings are a two-day event with live worship, fellowship and pastoral education. The state affiliation goes far beyond this two-day event, however. The state hires its own staff. We have a state pastor, a state youth pastor, and numerous other employees that facilitate the work of the individual congregations. Underneath the state pastor are several regional pastors who look after and mind pastors at churches as well as serving their own.

One of the key benefits of this system is that pastors are not left out to dry. Most pastors start as associate pastors with a bachelor's degree working under an experienced pastor. Some go to seminary, but some move straight on to ordination. Whoa! People need seminary! Really? How much do you know about St. Augustine or others in the middle ages who became pastors by mentorship or apprenticing. Just a conspiracy theory to try on for size: Could it be that non-hierarchical traditions need seminaries as a buffer because toughness is essential since once these students achieve ordination they are on their own? A seminary student is now judged ready for ministry by a psychologist's recommendations, rather than an apprenticeship. Calvin Seminary recently abandoned its traditional 2 concurrent years and 1 year internship field education requirements for a Lilly-dictated 15 weeks of real pastoral experience before ordination. 15 weeks before we set pastors loose in the church!

15 weeks.

This is not to say the CRC isn't making moves in this direction. It has to. In my estimation, that need will grow if we refuse to apprentice our young pastors with different levels of readiness. The CRC has created a Pastor-Church Relations office and an initiative called Sustaining Pastoral Excellence which provides opportunities for mentorship, peer learning, and continuing education. Unfortunately, these are still very optional. My home classis recently hired a part-time classical youth coordinator, which is an inspired move for a classis of small churches. We must acknowledge the benefits of regionalization and localization of ministries within the denomination. We're beginning to see it, but I want to point out the beauty of the Church of God's structure. No pastor is a lone ranger: they cannot be. I am thankful to be a part of both traditions during formative years as a young pastor. May our future pastors be open to this kind of molding.

4 comments:

Packerbacker said...

It's come across the pond...Europe has similar problems with few people churched.
Wasn't Luther's main problems with heirarchy with the abuse of power he saw which put it in a bad light. Or does absolute power corrupt absolutely no matter the denomination?

Adriane said...

"I am willing to make the bold statement that, minus infant baptism & Catechism references, the worship, the confession, the committee structures, and even the sermons would be interchangeable at face value. That's quite a statement in and of itself." That IS quite a statement . . . a false one with regard to Lutherans, but a statement nonetheless. Interesting reading.


--Adriane

Mark Hilbelink said...

Adriane~

I was making that statement in regard to the churches that I've participated directly in, which span a small handful of denominations. Never a Lutheran one, however....although talking do you and your dad got me a long way ;)

I'm actually talking with a local Lutheran youth minister about starting a coffeeshop/bar ministry to reach the 20-something age group. ELCA :(

Where's your blog?

peace,
Mark

Mark Hilbelink said...

Miss Adriane~

You can call me Pastor Mark, everyone else does. You'll appreciate that I was watching a curious show on PBS the other day called "Quizbusters" which is simply a rebirth of the long-dead Quiz Bowl here in Michigan. It includes "hipper" things like negative points for wrong answers and person-on-person Family-Feud-style matchups.

Here's the thing. If Christianity was supposed to be defined by rigid orthodoxy or orthopraxy, Christ would have laid that down and the early Church would have followed it. That's simply not the case. I will admit that Mormonism gains followers, but I think that's more due to consistency in moral teaching and practice which puts us all to shame in a different category altogether. Islam has a similar type of draw, but includes some mysticism.

The fact of the matter is that the notion of grace seems appealing to our logical minds, but our needy souls don't like it at all. Catholicism reigned supreme because it could fuse these two together by using penance as a means of grace. As we get swept along by the newest pendulum swing, lets not forget that Christianity (especially according to your boy Luther) has its base in grace, not in orthopraxy or even orthodoxy.

Once again, I think its also important to consider the way Christian movements have played out in urban and rural ministries. In urban centers, people who leave Christianity often choose to leave it and may catch on to something else. In rural areas, this is far less common and more often results in civil religion, or passive atheism.

Have a little love for the farmer, Adriane.